Thursday, August 31, 2006
[RealEdge] BT : Nassim Park sold to Park Developments for $380m
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[RealEdge] BT : Developer wins test case against tax authorities
Published August 31, 2006 | ||||||||
Developer wins test case against tax authorities Deductibility of borrowing expenses hinges on purpose of loan
By WEE LI-EN
(SINGAPORE) The Court of Appeal has delivered a landmark judgment against the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras), allowing a property developer tax deductions of $4.3 million for borrowing and refinancing expenses.
BT understands that several cases involving property developers were held pending the outcome of this case. And the decision affects not just property developers but all traders who obtain loans to finance the purchase and development of trading stock. Previously, Iras did not allow deduction of borrowing expenses, saying they were capital and not revenue in nature. Lawyers say this will change now that the court has decided that the deductibility of borrowing expenses depends on the purpose of the taxpayer in getting the loan. As for refinancing expenses, Iras previously allowed deductions on a concessionary basis. But lawyers say such expenses will now be deductible by law if the original loan is a revenue loan. They also say that after this case, the way loans are structured will have a bearing on whether expenses incurred in connection with them are tax deductible. 'Often businesses take large general purpose loans because they want to have the flexibility to use the money,' said Teoh Lian Ee, head of tax at Drew & Napier. 'But this flexibility to use the loan means they cannot get tax deductions under the new ruling which only allows tax deductions on loans which have the specific purpose of funding revenue purchases.' This means that companies that are certain that a loan is to fund revenue purchases or to develop trading stock should make sure this is stated in the agreement, and that amounts drawn down are only used for such a purpose. According to Mrs Teoh, they should then be able to enjoy tax deductions on expenses incurred in connection with the loan. Mrs Teoh represented the developer with team members Stacy Choong and Seah Ching Ling in the long-drawn appeal, which took more than four years from the date of filing the petition of appeal to the delivery of judgment. In the case, the property developer obtained a syndicated loan of $113 million to finance a major condominium project. The developer was able to repay the loan from progress payments received from the sales of the condo units before it was due, but had to furnish a bank guarantee to the Urban Redevelopment Authority to withdraw the sum. The identity of the property developer was not disclosed. The issues before the court were whether expenses of $4.3 million incurred in connection with the syndicated loan and the bank guarantee were revenue expenses and deductible against the developer's taxable income. Under the Income Tax Act, revenue expenses are generally deductible if they are wholly and exclusively incurred in the production of income, but capital expenses are generally not deductible. The expenses incurred in connection with the syndicated loan included underwriting and agency fees, and expenses associated with the bank guarantee included bank commissions and agency fees. The court, which looked at cases from various jurisdictions, held that whether an expense is capital or revenue in nature depends on the purpose of the taxpayer in obtaining the loan. The court, which comprised judges Andrew Phang, Judith Prakash and VK Rajah, found that the loan was obtained for a revenue purpose because it was to develop the condominium project for sale. Because of this, the borrowing and refinancing expenses in connection with the loan were also revenue in nature and deductible. However, developers who develop projects not for sale but for lease will not enjoy tax deductions on borrowing and refinancing expenses connected to a loan, as this will be considered a capital investment. |
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[RealEdge] BT : Silver Tower penthouse sold for $6.12m
Published August 31, 2006 | |||
Silver Tower penthouse sold for $6.12m $1,020 psf price reflects premium for condo's en bloc potential: analysts
By KALPANA RASHIWALA
THE collective sale of Silver Tower has yet to be concluded, but a penthouse in the freehold development in Cairnhill Road was sold yesterday for $6.12 million at an auction by Colliers International.
The price works out to $1,020 per square foot based on the 5,995 sq ft strata area of the three-level penthouse - a price market watchers said reflects a premium for the property's en bloc potential. A source suggested that based on its individual sale value, without factoring in potential for an en bloc deal, the penthouse could have fetched about $4.5 million or $750 psf. Silver Tower is about 20 years old. BT understands the penthouse had been on the auction circuit for at least three years. It was sold by its mortgagee, understood to be Hong Leong Finance. Three years ago, the mortgagee was said to be asking for $3.8 million for the unit. The buyer is said to be a Chinese individual from the region. The unit, #08-04, has a private pool and is tenanted until May 2007 at $4,000 a month. BT understands that despite paying a hefty premium for the penthouse, the new owner stands to reap a further $1 million or so if an en bloc sale of Silver Tower proceeds at the target price of $168 million. Based on this price, the owner would be able to collect about $7 million-plus for his unit. Savills Singapore, which is marketing the en bloc sale of Silver Tower, declined to comment yesterday except to say the collective deal is still under negotiation. Colliers also sold three other properties at yesterday's auction. One was a single-storey, freehold detached house with a land area of 6,183 sq ft in Sommerville Road off Upper Serangoon Road. It fetched $1.7 million. Another was a third-storey walk-up apartment in Lorong 15 Geylang. The 999,999-year leasehold property with 1,517 sq ft strata area fetched $310,000. Colliers also sold a three-storey JTC detached factory at 6 Woodlands Loop for $4.88 million. The property is on a site with 30 years' lease starting September 1994 with an option to renew for 30 years. All four properties sold yesterday were mortgagee sales. |
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[RealEdge] BT : SP Tao puts Anson House up for sale
Published August 31, 2006 | |
SP Tao puts Anson House up for sale SP TAO and his Indonesian partner Mackmoor Pte Ltd have put Anson House up for sale. The indicative guide price for the 99-year leasehold building is $80 million or $1,110 per square foot based on the current net lettable area (NLA) of 72,122 sq ft. However, marketing agent Savills Singapore says that there is potential for the NLA to be increased to 75,227 sq ft, assuming one tenant per floor which would allow some of the common areas to be converted to lettable area. Based on the enhanced potential NLA, the guide price reflects $1,063 psf. Eight-year-old Anson House, at the corner of Anson and Bernam streets, has a gross floor area of 96,734 sq ft. According to Savills, it will appeal to buyers looking for a corporate headquarters building, as well as to investors eyeing the upside in office rentals as new leases are signed and existing leases renewed. 'The supply of office space is presently very tight, further aggravated by the conversion of some of the older commercial buildings into inner-city residential apartments,' says Savills director of investment sales Steven Ming. Anson House is 13-storeys high and, besides offices, has ground-floor retail space and 103 car parking lots. 'Being 100 per cent occupied, the building is generating strong cashflow both from rental collections and fees from its generous car parking facilities,' Mr Ming says. The tender for Anson House closes on Oct 5. |
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[RealEdge] TodayOnline Forum: Clearing the air in en bloc estates
This story was printed from TODAYonline | |
Clearing the air in en bloc estates Sales committee, MC play a role in ensuring there is clear communication Thursday August 31, 2006 Letter from Chan Kok Hong I refer to Chiu Li Yu's letter, "When neighbours and friends turn into enemies" (Aug 29). It has been my experience as a professional managing agent for 24 years that neighbours and friends turn into enemies due to misunderstanding and miscommunication. Members of the public have little or no understanding of how an en bloc sale is conducted and hence, much suspicion has arisen concerning the legality of the "sales committee". Suffice it to say, a sales committee is no more than a group of volunteers who are interested in securing a good deal for their property and obtaining a good premium over the current market price, if their properties are sold "en bloc" instead of on a piecemeal basis. A marketing agent may be appointed by the sales committee without going through an AGM or EOGM. The Land Titles (Strata) Act only requires the sales committee to apply to the Strata Titles Board for an order if they are unable to obtain the consent of all the owners, but have met the minimum requirement of 80 per cent or 90 per cent (depending on age of the estate). However, there will be objectors or owners who feel that the sales committee's choice of marketing agent or reserve price does not meet their expectations. There will be contentions and ill feelings during this process, which will take more than 12 months. So my advice to all en bloc sales committees: Getting every owner to agree to sell, let alone sell at the same price, or agree on how the proceeds are to be distributed are monumental challenges. But having volunteered to accept the responsibility, one must be prepared to face the challenges that come with it. With reference to Tan Keng Ann's letter, "Owners right to take en bloc process in hand" (Aug 30), he is unfair to state that management councils (MC) and managing agents (MA) are able to manipulate affairs to their advantage. Due notice is given for AGMs and the attendance at such meetings is usually very low around 10 per cent to 20 per cent of the total ownership. In fact, my experience has been that low attendance at an AGM reflects that the owners are happy with the management of the estate. When individuals volunteer as council members, it is imperative that they understand the duties and functions of the council. The primary duty of a council is to "provide for proper maintenance and management of the common property". In that respect, keeping the cost of the maintenance low is also not a virtue as that may lead to neglect of the common property, resulting in low value for the property. I agree with Mr Tan's concept of preventive maintenance and keeping the estate in a good condition. As for the unfortunate misunderstanding between the MC and the owners, my advice is for the MC to hold frequent dialogue sessions with the owners and residents to get feedback. Harmonious living is what every owner looks for, but it is a two-way street and all parties must contribute to this process. | |
Copyright MediaCorp Press Ltd. All rights reserved. |
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[RealEdge] TodayOnline : It's the high end for SC Global
This story was printed from TODAYonline | |
It's the high end for SC Global Developer expects continued strong demand for luxury apartments here Thursday August 31, 2006 Dow Jones SC Global Developments intends to stay focused on building luxury homes in prime central locations in Singapore, despite the entry of large developers into what used to be a niche market. It also expects that there will continue to be strong demand for luxury apartments as Singapore's booming private banking business attracts more high-net-worth individuals, its chairman and chief executive Simon Cheong said. "Our focus is still very, very much Singapore. We are very confident of the high-end market," he said in a recent interview. Mr Cheong said that the recent appointment of a head of China operations at SC Global was aimed at giving the company a better feel of the market, and did not signal the start of a major thrust there. China, he said, could become a new market for SC Global a few years from now when the company is bigger. SC Global is a niche developer of high-end residences in Singapore, whose projects usually sell at large premiums to nearby developments due to the quality of the design and finishing. "SC Global is a pure play on the booming high-end residential segment in Singapore and its portfolio includes some of the most distinctive condominiums in prime districts 10 and 11," stockbrokers UOB-Kay Hian said in a report last month. SC Global recently made the headlines when it sold a 7,000-sq-ft penthouse at Boulevard Residences to now-disgraced Japanese fund manager Yoshiaki Murakami for $16 million a record price for a Singapore apartment. Apartments at Boulevard Residences sell for over $2,000 per square foot, making them one of the four or five most expensive addresses in Singapore. Other projects by SC Global include Three Three Robin in the Bukit Timah area which sold for between $1,100 and $1,450 per square foot, compared with $850 per square foot for nearby developments. Apartments at Lincoln Modern in the Newton/Novena suburb are being marketed for more than $1,000 per square foot. Mr Cheong said SC Global's strategy had always been to focus on developing residences for buyers who will pay a premium for quality finishing and an attractive physical environment, and not judge a development based on the price per square foot. "I don't want to downplay costs but in the high-end business, you cannot nickel and dime." SC Global is prepared to wait for customers who are willing to meet its higher asking prices as it believes that its developments are worth more when completed. Such an approach separates the company from other developers in Singapore which try to sell apartments "off the plan" as this allows them to receive money upfront. Turning to the broader residential property market, Mr Cheong predicted that the strong rally in luxury property prices would filter down to the middle- and low-end segments as Singapore takes steps to boost its population by encouraging immigration. Prices of luxury properties in Singapore have risen by 20 to 30 per cent over the past year due to strong foreign demand, but the broad market has remained relatively flat. The recent spate of "enbloc sales", whereby developers bought older apartments on prime land to redevelop into higher-density housing, will slow as construction costs rise and as the Government increases its development charges to reflect higher property values, said Mr Cheong. SC Global said yesterday that it had received the Strata Titles Board's approval for its $266-million en bloc purchase of the Paterson Tower. The company plans to develop it into a 24-storey residential building. | |
Copyright MediaCorp Press Ltd. All rights reserved. |
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[RealEdge] ST : More Sentosa Cove bungalow plots for sale at record prices
|
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[RealEdge] BT : Shing Kwan pays $29m for St Martin's Lodge
Published August 31, 2006 | |||
Shing Kwan pays $29m for St Martin's Lodge Price for the 19,335 sq ft freeholdsite works out to $1,154 ppr
By KALPANA RASHIWALA
FORMER Singapore Land chairman SP Tao's Shing Kwan Group has bought St Martin's Lodge in St Martin's Drive for $29.25 million in a collective sale.
The unit land price of the 19,335 square feet freehold site works out to $1,154 per sq ft of potential gross floor area including an estimated $2 million development charge. The site is zoned for residential use with a 1.4 plot ratio and a maximum height of five storeys. It can be redeveloped into a new project with about 15 units averaging 1,800 sq ft. Analysts estimate the breakeven cost could be $1,550 to $1,650 psf A company owned by Mr Tao's Shing Kwan Group was the highest bidder in a tender closed on Aug 22. CB Richard Ellis brokered the deal. Garden Estates, part of Singapore's Hong Leong Group, developed the 12-unit St Martin's Lodge, which was completed only in 1994. Owners of 11 of the 12 units have so far agreed to a collective sale. They will walk away with handsome gains, receiving $2.3 million if they own a 1,248 sq ft apartment or $2.6 million for a 1,668 sq ft unit - between 60 per cent and 100 per cent more than the units would have fetched if sold individually. Shing Kwan Group is looking primarily at boutique residential developments in Singapore with an all-up investment of about $50 million each. Cosmopolitan Development - Shing Kwan's joint venture with Mackmoor Pte Ltd, which is controlled by parties linked to Indonesia's Metropolitan group - developed 11 Amber Road, a 40-unit apartment block in Katong that is fully sold. It also developed The Quayside apartments and retail outlets along the Singapore River, and Anson House. Shing Kwan also has interests in China and Sri Lanka - including Shanghai Mart, Landmark Towers complex in Beijing, Mandarin Garden Hotel in Nanjing and The World Trade Center in Colombo. |
You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___