HOUSING agents should not take commissions from both the buyer              and seller of an HDB flat, the Consumers Association of Singapore              (Case) said yesterday.              
The reason: There is a potential conflict of interest.              
If an agent appointed by a seller also expects a commission from              a buyer, it would not be clear whose interests he is best              representing.              
Currently, the common - but controversial - practice is for an              agent to collect 2 per cent of the HDB flat sale price from the              seller and 1 per cent from the buyer.              
For private home sales, however, buyers who are not represented              by agents are usually not asked to pay the 1 per cent fee.              
This is mainly because private home prices are much higher,              translating into higher commissions.              
This practice appears to be supported by the Institute of Estate              Agents (IEA).              
For private home sales, its guidelines say that buyers should pay              a 1 per cent 'finder's fee' if they have appointed the agent.              
But the similar guideline for HDB flat deals simply states that              the buyer should pay a 1 per cent service fee - without stipulating              whether the agent is appointed by him or not.              
The IEA also says that agents should not collect commissions from              both the buyer and seller without their prior knowledge.              
Although there is no law on the commission payable, Case              yesterday took issue with the different standards.              
It told The Straits Times: 'The IEA allows its member agents              dealing with HDB transactions to collect commissions from both              buyers and sellers, citing it as a 'market practice'.              
'We feel strongly that buyers and sellers of HDB flats deserve              the same protection as those contracting in private property.'              
But the IEA yesterday defended the need for different commission              structures.              
Its second vice-president Low Swee Kim said that, due to lower              prices of HDB flats, it would not be viable for sellers' agents to              waive the fee they charge buyers.              
Also, he said that agents dealing in HDB flats have to do more              work because they do not have the help of lawyers, who are usually              hired for private home sales.              
He added, however, that agents should make known upfront the fee              that they charge.              
But some flat buyers have complained that this does not happen.              
They say they are told about the 1 per cent fee just before they              sign the purchase documents, putting them under pressure to pay.              
One of them is Ms Tati Hussain, who bought a four-room flat in              Chua Chu Kang earlier this year.              
The 34-year-old sales support coordinator did her own research on              resale procedures of HDB flats and went house-hunting late last year              without the help of an agent.              
In January, just as she was concluding the purchase of her flat,              the seller's agent asked her to pay a 1 per cent fee, saying that it              was 'a regulation'.              
She said: 'I was shocked. He had never mentioned the commission              earlier.'              
Ms Tati refused to pay, but the deal was completed anyway.              
The debate over the double commissions comes at a time when more              buyers and sellers are choosing to shun agents.              
According to the HDB, 3 per cent of last year's 31,000 resale              housing applications were made via its online e-Resale system, which              is designed for people who do not want to employ agents.              
The figure has crept up from 2.5 per cent in 2004 and 2 per cent              the year before.              
tanhy@sph.com.sg